• The Tavern needs to be a safe place and comply with the law. In the UK the OSA requires us to know the age of our members and posters, and yet the UK Govt. has not provided a method to do this that is affordable to small voluntary BBS like ours. To that end, all members are safe and secure, we know you must be adults by now. However if you wish to join as a member, please contact us using the form at the [very] bottom of the page and we shall do a one to one verifiaction.

[watching] Doctor Who

My digibox died over Xmas, so I've bought all the Dr Who I only had as recordings and am re-watching them. I have discovered that I've completely forgotten several of the episodes in Series 10 (Capaldi with Bill as companion). So it is fun 'rediscovering' them.
 
The final four-screen consolidated UK viewing figures for the first two episodes of War Between the Land and Sea have been published by BARB. They both show massive big increase on the overnight ratings, showing that more people than ever are streaming BBC programmes on iPlayer.

Homo Aqua was watched by 6.06m viewers and was the11th most watched programme for the week. Plastic Apocalypse was watched by 5.07m viewers and was the 15th most watched programme for the week.
 
I need to finish watching it.
Been distracted by Trek.
 
Two missing episodes, both from The Daleks' Master Plan, have been recovered by Film is Fabulous. The announcement had been expected for some time. The episodes The Nightmare Begins (episode one) and Devil's Planet (episode three) were discovered in a cardboard box among a collector's collection of vintage films. That brings the total number of episodes for the serial in the BBC archive up to five, but the remaining seven are still missing.

Edit: The recovered missing episodes will be heading to iPlayer this Easter.

 
Last edited:
Russell T Davies: “I won’t be back filming anything until next year”

This doesn't bode well. With speculation the planned 2026 Christmas special is being postponed or cancelled, this only adds more fuel to the fire.

Except, he was asked what he's doing next, and he's already written the script for the Christmas special. I also wonder what the word "really" was doing at the end of that answer in the interview.
The article points out that the answers can be interpreted a couple of ways, not necessarily to mean Dr Who isn't happening.
He's got a history of very carefully interpreting questions and wording answers to avoid saying stuff he doesn't want public yet.

Most of the speculation about it not happening appears to have come from an article in The Sun focused on the fact that filming hasn't started yet (despite it not being scheduled until September)

We're going to have to wait and see, I think.
 
I know the rumours go back to The Sun article, and I agree we need to be careful because a lot of this is still speculation. However, I do think Russell T Davies saying he's not filming anything until next year is odd, especially when he's the executive producer and has always been very hands-on with Doctor Who. He's usually closely involved with production, not just writing scripts from home.

That doesn't prove the Christmas special is cancelled, and I'm not saying it does. But when you put that comment alongside the fact that filming apparently hasn't started yet, the uncertainty around casting, and the lack of clear official information, I can understand why people are questioning what's actually happening. It may simply be that they are keeping things quiet, but I do think there're enough odd details here to make the situation worth keeping an eye on.
 
It's the Sun...
 
The Christmas Special has officially been cancelled. But the series is not dead, as the BBC plan put the show out to tender late this year.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2026/update-doctor-who-future

Russel T Davies wrote on Instagram:

"And so GOODBYE from me to Doctor Who but HELLO to a big new future for the show, as the BBC announces it’s putting the show out to tender. As a result, there won’t be a Christmas Special - we only cooked that up to guarantee a future when no one knew what would happen, but now we do know, there’s no need for it. You’ll have to wait a bit longer for new Doctor Who… but you’ll be waiting for MORE Doctor Who than a one-off. So it’s worth it! For the record: there was no script, I never wrote it, and no actor was ever approached to play the next Doctor. You may disagree; fine, sit in that chair and wait to be proved right. You’ll wait a lonnng time 🪑 Now I’m as excited as anyone to see what comes next! Will they keep the theme tune? Will they lose the blue box? Will they bring back the Drahvin?! It’s all up for grabs, which is so Doctor Who, exciting and unpredictable and new! Here comes the future, vworp vworp"
 
Last edited:
Doctor Who is very much alive! From what I have heard from a friend in the industry, activities related to the show are apparently continuing behind the scenes, even if there is nothing actually going in front of the cameras at the moment or even a new showrunner in place. That suggests the series hasn't been completely shelved, but rather that it's been placed on hold while decisions are being made about its future direction. I have also heard that the split between Russell T Davies, Bad Wolf, and the BBC was not particularly amicable, which may help explain why there has been so little public information and why the BBC failed to thank them in their press release.

Of course, much of this is based on industry chatter rather than official announcements, so it should be treated with some caution. However, it does fit with the fact that television productions can often spend long periods in development before any filming begins, especially when there are changes in creative leadership, funding arrangements, or distribution plans.

Last year, the commissioned children’s cartoon provides an interesting comparison. The project went out to tender in July, and by December the BBC had already announced the company that would be producing the series. That was a relatively quick turnaround, showing that the BBC can move fairly rapidly when it is ready to commit to a project like Doctor Who.

For that reason, I don't think the current lack of news necessarily means that nothing is happening. If discussions are ongoing behind the scenes, it is entirely possible that we could still hear something concrete about a new series before the end of the year. Whether that takes the form of an announcement about a new partnership, or confirmation of future plans remains to be seen, but I would not rule out news arriving sooner rather than later.

Additional: From all the talk, the BBC originally planned to put Dr Who out to tender in 2028 - that's if the the Christmas Special went ahead this year. However, I believe that was being used as leverage to get RTD to quit and it worked. RTD had to go so the tender could be brought foward by two years.
 
I have been reviewing the viewing figures for Doctor Who and wanted to share my findings with other fans. The reason I have done this is because I have become fed up with certain people in the press and fandom taking the viewing figures out of context. The figures are often used to make sweeping claims about the programme and how it is failing, but they do not always take into account when the episodes were broadcast, how television viewing has changed, or what the wider television landscape looked like at the time.

The viewing figures for Doctor Who have to be understood in the context of when each Doctor was on television. The way people watched television changed significantly between 1963 and the modern era, so the figures cannot be judged in exactly the same way across every period. The classic series did not have 7-day consolidated figures in the modern sense, so the figures for William Hartnell through to Sylvester McCoy are based on the available UK television audience figures for the original broadcasts. The revived series figures are based on consolidated 7-day UK viewing figures, which include catch-up viewing where this was counted.

It is also important to remember that the wider UK television landscape changed a great deal during the programme’s history. Doctor Who began when there were only two main UK television channels, before moving through the three-channel and four-channel eras, then into the age of satellite, cable, digital television, catch-up viewing and streaming. This means that a figure which may look low in one era may not mean the same thing in another.

To give the figures more context, I have also included a limited benchmark for ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during each Doctor’s tenure. This is not a complete average of every programme broadcast, but a general comparison point for the kind of regular television audience that programmes could expect at the time. For the first four Doctors, the benchmark should be treated as a much looser historical estimate, because the available data is less consistent. For the later Doctors, the benchmark is still an approximate, but it gives a useful comparison with the wider television environment of the period.

William Hartnell’s tenure averaged 8.48 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Web Planet episode one, which had 13.5 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Smugglers episode three, which had 4.2 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Hartnell’s tenure averaged around 9.50 million viewers. When Hartnell began, there were two main UK television channels, BBC Television and ITV. BBC Two launched during his time as the Doctor in 1964, which increased the main channel choice to three. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Patrick Troughton’s tenure averaged 6.97 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Krotons episode one, which had 9.0 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The War Games episode eight, which had 3.5 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Troughton’s tenure averaged around 9.00 million viewers. During Troughton’s time, the UK had three main television channels: BBC One, BBC Two and ITV. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Jon Pertwee’s tenure averaged 8.23 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Three Doctors episode four, which had 11.9 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was Inferno episode three, which had 4.8 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Pertwee’s tenure averaged around 9.50 million viewers. During Pertwee’s time, the UK still had three main television channels: BBC One, BBC Two and ITV. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Tom Baker’s tenure averaged 9.27 million viewers. His highest rated episode was City of Death episode four, which had 16.1 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was Full Circle episode two, which had 3.7 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Tom’s tenure averaged around 10.50 million viewers. For most of Tom Baker’s time, there were three main UK television channels: BBC One, BBC Two and ITV. Channel 4 had not yet launched. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Peter Davison’s tenure averaged 7.90 million viewers. His highest rated episode was Castrovalva episode four, which had 10.4 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was Frontios episode four, which had 5.6 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Davison’s tenure averaged around 10.00 million viewers. When Davison began, the UK still had three main television channels. Channel 4 and S4C launched in November 1982, which meant his era moved into the four-channel period. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Colin Baker’s tenure averaged 6.07 million viewers. His highest rated episode was Attack of the Cybermen episode one, which had 8.9 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Mysterious Planet episode four, which had 3.7 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during Colin’s tenure averaged around 9.50 million viewers. During Colin Baker’s time, the UK had four main terrestrial television channels: BBC One, BBC Two, ITV and Channel 4, with S4C in Wales. There were no cable or satellite channels and no streaming services at the time.

Sylvester McCoy’s tenure averaged 4.81 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Greatest Show in the Galaxy episode four, which had 6.6 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was Battlefield episode one, which had 3.1 million viewers. As a loose estimate, ordinary mainstream UK terrestrial television viewing during McCoy’s tenure averaged around 8.00 million viewers. During most of McCoy’s time, the UK had four main terrestrial television channels. Sky launched as a satellite television provider in 1989, but the ordinary terrestrial choice was still mainly four channels. There were no streaming services at the time.

Christopher Eccleston’s tenure averaged 7.95 million viewers. His highest rated episode was Rose, which had 10.81 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was Bad Wolf, which had 6.81 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Eccleston’s tenure were approximately 7.50 million viewers. By 2005, the UK had five main terrestrial channels, but viewers also had access to a growing number of digital, satellite and cable channels. Freeview had already changed the television landscape by this point. BBC iPlayer had not yet launched, so there was not yet the same streaming context that later Doctors had.

David Tennant’s first tenure averaged 8.35 million viewers. His highest rated episode was Voyage of the Damned, which had 13.31 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Satan Pit, which had 6.08 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Tennant’s first tenure were approximately 7.75 million viewers. During Tennant’s first time as the Doctor, the UK had five main terrestrial channels, but digital television, Freeview, satellite and cable meant the actual number of available channels was far larger. BBC iPlayer launched in 2007, so catch-up viewing became part of the viewing landscape during his era, although it was not as dominant as it later became.

Matt Smith’s tenure averaged 7.98 million viewers. His highest rated episode, counting The Day of the Doctor as part of his tenure, was The Day of the Doctor, which had 12.80 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Lodger, which had 6.44 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Smith’s tenure is approximately 7.50 million viewers. During Smith’s time, the UK television market was fully multi-channel, with Freeview, satellite and cable all established. BBC iPlayer was already available, Netflix launched in the UK in 2012, and other on-demand services were becoming a normal part of television viewing.

Peter Capaldi’s tenure averaged 6.42 million viewers. His highest rated episode was Deep Breath, which had 9.17 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Eaters of Light, which had 4.73 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Capaldi’s tenure is approximately 6.25 million viewers. During Capaldi’s time, the UK had a large multi-channel television market, with BBC iPlayer, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Now TV and other on-demand services all competing for viewers’ time. This meant Doctor Who was no longer being watched in the same television environment as the classic series or even the early revived series.

Jodie Whittaker’s tenure averaged 6.13 million viewers. Her highest rated episode was The Woman Who Fell to Earth, which had 10.96 million viewers. Her lowest rated episode was Legend of the Sea Devils, which had 3.47 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Whittaker’s second tenure is approximately 5.25 million viewers. During Whittaker’s time, the UK television market was heavily shaped by streaming and catch-up viewing. BBC iPlayer, Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Now TV were already established, Disney+ launched in the UK in 2020, and ITVX launched near the end of her time as the Doctor.

David Tennant’s second tenure as the Fourteenth Doctor averaged 7.20 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Star Beast, which had 7.61 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Giggle, which had 6.85 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Tennant’s second tenure is approximately 5.00 million viewers. By this point, UK audiences had access to a very large number of digital channels and streaming services. In the UK, Doctor Who was available through BBC One and BBC iPlayer, while Disney+ carried the programme internationally.

Ncuti Gatwa’s tenure averaged 3.80 million viewers. His highest rated episode was The Church on Ruby Road, which had 7.49 million viewers. His lowest rated episode was The Story & the Engine, which had 2.70 million viewers. As a benchmark, the average regular terrestrial programme viewing figures during Gatwa's tenure is approximately 4.50 million viewers. During Gatwa’s time, the UK viewing landscape was dominated by multi-channel television, BBC iPlayer and major streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+, Apple TV+ and others. Doctor Who was also released on BBC iPlayer before its BBC One broadcast for the 2024 and 2025 series, which further changed how the audience watched it compared with earlier eras.

Looking at the viewing figures in context, Doctor Who’s ratings history is more complicated than simply saying the programme was successful in one period and failing in another. The figures show that the programme has always moved up and down depending on the Doctor, the era, the scheduling, the available channels and the wider television landscape. The classic series was broadcast in a very different world, where there were far fewer channels and no cable, satellite, catch-up or streaming services. Even then, the figures were not always consistent, with some Doctors averaging close to the wider television benchmark and others falling below it.

The first four Doctors were working in a much smaller television market, but even their figures varied quite a lot. William Hartnell, Jon Pertwee and Tom Baker all averaged strong figures, while Patrick Troughton’s average was lower by comparison. Tom Baker had the highest average of the classic Doctors, but his era also benefited from a period when television audiences were still very concentrated around the main channels. By the time of Peter Davison, Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy, the programme was operating in a changing television environment, and the figures show a clear decline across the 1980s. McCoy’s average in particular was well below the benchmark for ordinary mainstream television viewing at the time.

The revived series began in a much more competitive television landscape. Christopher Eccleston’s average of 7.95 million viewers was very strong when compared with the regular terrestrial benchmark of around 7.50 million. David Tennant’s first tenure also performed strongly, averaging 8.35 million viewers against a benchmark of around 7.75 million. Matt Smith’s era was also above the benchmark, while Peter Capaldi’s average was close to the wider regular television figure of the time. This shows that the revived series was not simply relying on nostalgia or novelty, but was still performing well within the television market it was broadcast in.

The later figures need to be treated with particular care. Jodie Whittaker’s average of 6.13 million viewers was lower than several earlier Doctors, but it was still above the regular terrestrial benchmark of around 5.25 million for her period. David Tennant’s second tenure also performed strongly, averaging 7.20 million viewers against a benchmark of around 5.00 million. Ncuti Gatwa’s average of 3.80 million viewers is lower, but his era is also being judged in a very different viewing environment, with BBC iPlayer, streaming platforms, digital competition and episodes being released online before their BBC One broadcast.

Overall, the figures show that Doctor Who’s ratings cannot be judged properly without context. A raw number on its own does not tell the full story. A figure that looks low compared with the 1970s may still be reasonable in the modern television landscape, while a high figure from the past has to be understood in an era when viewers had far fewer alternatives. This is why it is misleading when people in the press or fandom take the ratings out of context to claim that the programme is failing. The viewing figures show changes, rises and falls, but they do not support a simple or lazy conclusion about the health of the programme across its whole history.
 
Awesome analysis.

Journalists would have to factor in things like population growth and television ownership too.
The UK population was only 53 million (ish) when Doctor Who began, and not every household had a TV. If they did, the whole family watched together. It's 68 million now. And as well as on a TV you can watch on your laptop, tablet, etc, so every family member can watch something different.
 
It was pointed out to me on Mastodon that you may not have taken into account the availability of BBC 3 during the Pertwee era…

66C93EF4-F0C3-48C7-BF0C-1629F2BC83E2.png
 
Back
Top